In June 2025, Singapore’s population reached 6.11 million. Of those, 1.91 million – nearly one in three people on the island – are non-residents. Add permanent residents to that number, and more than 40% of everyone living in Singapore was not born here.
That figure sits at the centre of one of the most persistent and emotionally charged debates in Singapore public life: the question of foreigners. It comes up at hawker centres, in HDB corridors, on Reddit threads, in Telegram group chats, and – every five years – at the ballot box. In 2020, the ruling People’s Action Party had its worst general election result since independence, and the frustration of locals over foreign workers was cited as a significant factor. Meanwhile in 2022, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said ” Singapore must never let anti-foreigner sentiments take root or give the impression that it is becoming more inward-looking.”
So what is actually driving this? And what should Singapore parents be telling their children about it?
The Numbers Behind the Feeling
Singapore’s relationship with foreign labour is not new – it was built into the country’s economic model from the beginning. A small island with no natural resources and a limited population cannot sustain the workforce needed to remain competitive without importing labour. This is not a secret. It is stated government policy.
What has changed is the scale and the visibility. In 1970, non-residents made up just 2.9% of Singapore’s population. By 2025, that figure stands at 31%. The transformation happened within a single lifetime. Many Singaporeans who grew up in a more homogeneous city now live in neighbourhoods, work in offices, and ride MRT trains that feel fundamentally different from the Singapore they remember.
Demographic change at this speed is jarring anywhere in the world. In Singapore, it has been particularly acute because the change happened alongside rising costs of living, growing competition for housing and school places, and a persistent sense among some locals that the rules are not the same for everyone.
The Jobs Question
This is where the frustration runs deepest. A 2021 survey found that slightly more than half of Singaporeans believe immigrants take jobs away from locals. Whether or not this is statistically accurate across the board, the perception is real – and for individual Singaporeans who have lost jobs or been passed over for positions in favour of foreign candidates, the data is beside the point.
The complaints are most concentrated in PMET roles – Professional, Managerial, Executive and Technical positions. Some locals have described feeling like second-class citizens in their own country, passed over for roles they feel qualified for, in companies that appear to prefer hiring from specific nationalities.
The government has pushed back on this with its own numbers: in the last ten years, resident PMET employment increased by 382,000, while Employment Pass and S Pass holders increased by only 38,000. In high-growth sectors like finance, professional services, and tech, locals gained 172,000 PMET jobs compared to 17,000 for foreign pass holders. The headline numbers suggest that foreign professionals are not displacing locals at scale.
But statistics are averages. They do not capture the experience of the specific Singaporean who applied for a specific job and did not get it – particularly when they discover that the team they would have joined is composed almost entirely of nationals from a single foreign country. It is this pattern – visible, concentrated, and seemingly deliberate – that drives the strongest resentment.
The government has responded. The COMPASS framework, introduced in 2023, now applies a points-based assessment to Employment Pass applications, penalising companies with excessive dependence on foreigners of a single nationality. Since its introduction, the share of such firms has dropped by 15%, and these same firms created 4,000 more PMET jobs for locals. The Employment Pass minimum salary was also raised to S$5,600 per month. These are meaningful policy shifts – but they came after years of frustration, and trust takes time to rebuild.
Beyond Jobs: Housing, Schools, and Identity
The grievances extend beyond employment. Housing prices have been driven partly by wealthy foreigners purchasing private property, putting upward pressure on a market that Singaporeans at every income level depend on. MRT trains and buses at peak hours are crushingly crowded. Competition for places in good schools is felt keenly by parents who believe their children are competing not just with other Singaporeans but with an expanding pool of foreign families who have chosen Singapore partly because of its education system.
There is also an identity dimension that is harder to quantify. Some Singaporeans describe a feeling of estrangement – of walking through their own city and feeling like a guest. The sounds are different. The faces are different. The conversations in lifts and at coffeeshops are in languages you don’t recognise. This experience is not the same as racism – the foreigners in question are not a single race – but it touches something similar: the unsettling sense that the place you called home has become unfamiliar without your consent.
The Other Side of the Ledger
None of this means the presence of foreigners in Singapore is straightforwardly harmful. The same economic model that has made Singapore one of the wealthiest countries in the world – and that funds the schools, hospitals, housing subsidies, and social safety nets that Singaporeans depend on – requires a larger workforce than the local population can provide.
Singapore’s birth rate is among the lowest in the world (more on that in a separate article). An ageing population and a shrinking labour force would, without immigration, produce an economic contraction that would hurt Singaporeans far more than the current frustrations. The foreign professionals, workers, and entrepreneurs who come to Singapore also start companies, create jobs, pay taxes, and contribute to the social and cultural fabric of the city.
Most Singaporeans accept this intellectually. The same 2021 survey that found more than half of respondents believe immigrants take local jobs also found that most agree immigration is broadly good for the economy. The tension is between what people know to be true at a macro level and what they experience at the level of their own life.
What to Tell Your Children
The locals-versus-foreigners debate is one your children will encounter – at school, online, in family conversations, and eventually in the workplace. How parents frame it matters.
A few principles worth holding onto:
Frustration is legitimate without foreigners being the enemy. Singaporeans who feel crowded out of their own city, who struggle to compete for jobs or housing, who feel unheard by policymakers – these feelings are real and worth taking seriously. They should not be dismissed as xenophobia. The target of the frustration is a system and a set of policies, not the individuals who have moved here in good faith.
Foreign workers are not a monolith. The Employment Pass holder in a CBD office, the construction worker on a work permit, the domestic helper who raised you – these are all “foreigners,” but their experiences, their vulnerabilities, and their relationship to Singapore are radically different. Lumping them together obscures more than it reveals.
Singapore was built by immigrants. Every Singaporean family, if you go back far enough, came from somewhere else. The founding generation of Singapore was itself composed of migrants from China, India, the Malay Archipelago, and beyond. The instinct to protect what was built here is understandable. So is recognising that it was built by people who were not from here.
Policy questions deserve policy answers. The solution to unfair hiring practices is stronger enforcement of fair employment laws. The solution to housing unaffordability is housing policy. The solution to overcrowding is infrastructure investment. These are debates worth having – and they are better had in terms of policy than in terms of which groups of people are welcome.
Singapore’s tension with foreigners is unlikely to resolve neatly. It is rooted in genuine economic pressures, legitimate feelings of displacement, and the fundamental challenge of a small city-state that needs the world to function but also needs to remain a home for the people who belong to it. Sitting with that complexity honestly is what a thoughtful Singapore education should prepare children to do.
At Curio, we believe in preparing students not just academically, but as thinking citizens. Register at curio.sg


















































































































































































