Your child comes home upset. A classmate called them a “banana.” Or told them their skin is “too dark.” Or laughed at the way they pronounce certain words. Or said they’re “not really Chinese” because they don’t speak Mandarin. Or “not really Indian” because they don’t know the temple prayers. Or not really “anything” because their parents are of different races.
The source of the cruelty isn’t a child of a different race. It’s a child of the same one.
This is intra-racial racism – discrimination that happens not between races but within them. It is one of the least discussed forms of prejudice in Singapore, in part because our national conversation about race focuses almost entirely on inter-racial tensions. But for many children, the wound of being rejected by their own community cuts deeper than any slur from outside it.
Why It Happens in Singapore
To understand intra-racial racism here, you need to understand the CMIO model – the framework that classifies every Singaporean as Chinese, Malay, Indian, or Other. Introduced at independence and embedded in everything from IC registration to school mother tongue assignments, CMIO was designed to manage diversity. What it also did, unintentionally, was flatten it.
Beneath the single label “Chinese” are Hokkiens, Teochews, Cantonese, Hakkas, Hainanese, and many others – communities with distinct languages, customs, and histories. Beneath “Indian” are Tamils, Malayalis, Punjabis, Bengalis, Sindhis, and more. “Malay” encompasses Javanese, Bugis, Boyanese, and other ethnic groups. The official categories erase all of this complexity and replace it with a single, simplified identity – one that each child is expected to inhabit fully.
The problem is that not every child fits the mould. Those who don’t often find out from other children first.
The Specific Forms It Takes
The “banana” phenomenon. Chinese children who are more comfortable in English than Mandarin – a very common situation in Singapore, where English is the dominant home language for many Chinese families – are sometimes called “bananas” by peers: yellow on the outside, white on the inside. The term implies cultural inauthenticity, a failure to be Chinese enough. This is particularly ironic given that at Singapore’s independence in 1965, many ethnic Chinese here did not speak Mandarin as their primary home language – the community’s roots were in Hokkien, Teochew, Cantonese, and other dialects. The Mandarin-as-Chinese-identity construct is a relatively recent policy creation, not an ancient cultural truth.
Colourism within the Indian and Malay communities. Research identifies East Asia as the world region with the highest levels of skin colour bias. Within Singapore’s Indian community, darker-skinned children can face comments about their complexion from relatives, peers, and even strangers within the same community – absorbed into a racialised beauty hierarchy that privileges lighter skin. Studies document that dark-skinned individuals face measurable bias in assessments of competence and attractiveness, and that these biases are internalised early. Children who grow up hearing that their complexion is a problem carry that message into adulthood.
“You don’t act Malay” or “You don’t act Indian.” Children who don’t observe certain cultural or religious practices, who have accents that don’t match expectations, who have mixed heritage, or who simply don’t conform to the social script of their assigned race can be told by peers that they are inauthentic. The specific content of these accusations varies, but the emotional logic is the same: you are not one of us, even though you are supposed to be.
SAP schools and racial homogeneity. Singapore’s Special Assistance Plan schools are effectively Chinese-only environments, where students can spend up to ten years with minimal meaningful interaction with peers of other races. However, Chinese students who don’t fit the dominant cultural mould within SAP schools – who are English-dominant, who have mixed heritage, who diverge from social expectations – can also find themselves marginalised within what is nominally “their” community.
What This Does to a Child
The psychological impact of intra-racial racism is distinct from that of inter-racial racism, and in some ways more complicated. When a child is rejected by members of another race, there is at least a conceptual framework for understanding it – they are different, and some people treat difference badly. When a child is rejected by members of their own race, the rejection reaches something deeper: the sense that there is no community to belong to, no authentic identity available, no safe harbour in either world.
Research on racial identity development shows that children who experience intra-racial rejection are at higher risk of identity confusion, low self-esteem, and social anxiety. They may feel pressure to perform an identity that doesn’t feel authentic – to speak differently, dress differently, signal belonging in ways that cost them. Or they may disengage from their heritage community altogether, which comes with its own losses.
What Parents Can Do
Name it clearly. Children who experience intra-racial racism often don’t have a framework for it. They may just feel that something is wrong with them. Naming what happened – “what that child said was a form of racism, and it was wrong” – gives them language and removes self-blame.
Challenge the idea that there is one way to be. There is no single correct way to be Chinese, Malay, Indian, or any other race. Singapore’s racial categories are administrative constructs, not cultural mandates. Your child is allowed to have a complex, layered identity that doesn’t map neatly onto a checkbox. Saying this explicitly, and often, matters.
Validate their heritage without policing it. Parents can celebrate culture and heritage without using it as a standard against which the child is measured. Learning about where your family comes from, the food, the stories, the history – this is enriching. Being told you’re not enough of your race because you don’t meet someone else’s checklist – this is harmful.
Build community that affirms them. Look for spaces – community groups, cultural organisations, online communities – where your child can find others who share their specific experience. The mixed-heritage child, the English-dominant Chinese child, the dark-skinned Indian child who grew up hearing comments about their complexion – all of these children benefit enormously from finding others who say: I know exactly what you mean.
Talk about the CMIO system. Older children and teenagers can benefit from understanding where Singapore’s racial categories came from and what they were designed to do. This doesn’t mean dismissing race as meaningless – it clearly isn’t – but it means giving children the historical and political context to understand why the box they’ve been put in doesn’t always fit, and why that says nothing about them.
The child who is told they are not Chinese enough, not Malay enough, not Indian enough – is enough. The categories are the problem, not the child inside them.
At Curio, our tutors come from diverse backgrounds and create supportive learning environments for all students. Register at curio.sg
Leave a Reply